|
Italy-ET-ET Κατάλογοι Εταιρεία
|
Εταιρικά Νέα :
- Is there any reason to prefer the AIC or BIC over the other?
296 The AIC and BIC are both methods of assessing model fit penalized for the number of estimated parameters As I understand it, BIC penalizes models more for free parameters than does AIC Beyond a preference based on the stringency of the criteria, are there any other reasons to prefer AIC over BIC or vice versa?
- How to compare models on the basis of AIC? - Cross Validated
The AIC value contains scaling constants coming from the log-likelihood L, and so Δi are free of such constants One might consider Δi = AICi − AICmin a rescaling transformation that forces the best model to have AICmin:= 0 The formulation of AIC penalizes the use of an excessive number of parameters, hence discourages overfitting
- regression - When do you use AIC vs. BIC - Cross Validated
How do you know when to use AIC or BIC for determining model fit? Is it just a judgment call? Is there an intuitive explanation as to which heuristic is better than the other?
- What is a difference between a Low AIC and a Bigger AIC
AIC is the Akaike information criterion (wiki) In general, a model with smaller AIC is a better model As an alternative, people also use BIC to choose model For Bayesian models, DIC is also very popular In modern statistics, we often use cross validation to choose models instead of AIC
- AIC or p-value: which one to choose for model selection?
This does not mean the variables are useless As a quick rule of thumb, selecting your model with the AIC criteria is better than looking at p-values One reason one might not select the model with the lowest AIC is when your variable to datapoint ratio is large Note that model selection and prediction accuracy are somewhat distinct problems
- How does AIC vs. LASSO work? - Cross Validated
3 I understand that LASSO and AIC are striking for a balance between model fit and size However, how do they respectively measure the size complexity of the model? Does AIC measure the number of parameters and LASSO measures the coefficients?
- logistic - What is the difference in what AIC and c-statistic (AUC . . .
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the c-statistic (area under ROC curve) are two measures of model fit for logistic regression I am having trouble explaining what is going on when the results
- Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) derivation - Cross Validated
I am trying to understand the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) derivation and this resource explains it quite well, although there are some mysteries for me First of all, it considers $\\hat{\\th
- GAM (mgcv): AIC vs Deviance Explained - Cross Validated
AIC It appears that deviance explained is simply the inverse of AIC, and AIC does not seem to be penalized by variation in the model's EDF I plotted deviance explained vs AIC and was surprised that they were almost perfectly correlated This seemed counter intuitive AIC vs Dev Expl Question Commment 1 - I found three different ways to call AIC:
- AIC and its degrees of freedom for linear regression models
AIC = 2k + n log(RSS n) A I C = 2 k + n log (R S S n) where k k is the number or estimated parameters (degrees of freedom) and n n is the sample size So we can easily calculate AIC value for all three models And I have two questions: 1 Can I compare AIC's values of these models and choose the best one with the lowest AIC?
|
|