|
USA-TN-SEWANEE Κατάλογοι Εταιρεία
|
Εταιρικά Νέα :
- Why people use `rel=noopener noreferrer` instead of just `rel . . .
Yes, good questions I searched a lot before answering this To be honest, I have the same doubts, and I don't know exactly why there is this general recommendation to use both
- a标签里的rel=noreferrer noopener，是什么意思？ - 知乎
a标签里的rel="noreferrer noopener"，是什么意思？ - 知乎
- html - Link with target=_blank and rel=noopener noreferrer still . . .
rel="noopener" prevents the new page from being able to access the window opener property and ensures it
- Best way to add rel=noopener noreferrer nofollow to all external . . .
anchors forEach(anchor => anchor setAttribute( 'rel', 'noopener noreferrer nofollow')); Your first method still selects local paths (like images ), but those aren't going to an external site Your second method will get confusing, as there is no easy way to know that this method is handling a click
- Window. open with noopener opens a new window instead of a new tab
I suppose the correct syntax would be noopener=1 true yes It looks like all the other window features would be somehow connected to a window with a chrome, and noopener is the only one which actually is usefull also in tabs Maybe that has been forgotten in browser implementations, and when the windowFeature argument is present, the window
- javascript - How to automatically add rel=noopener to a target . . .
One small improvement to labu4bd's answer above (very useful, thank you!) is to change the initial filter to only amend links in the body so they are not added to style script links in the head
- Do I need to put rel=noopener to each target=blank even if the . . .
Ask questions, find answers and collaborate at work with Stack Overflow for Teams Try Teams for free Explore Teams
- rel=nofollow noopener - Possible to have both at the same time?
According to MDN Doc noreferrer implies noopener but does noopener implies nofollow(or vice-versa)? I see no info about that but I would like a confirm if it's not implied in any of the both ways I see no info about that but I would like a confirm if it's not implied in any of the both ways
- Why do links with rel=noopener noreferrer always open in a new tab?
My guess - with a different tab name specified by the application itself, there’s probably concerns that some sort of info that is not supposed to leak, could leak nonetheless - for example if a different script opened a tab with that name first, but without noopener - then it could have a reference to that tab, and still use that reference
|
|