|
USA-KY-WINCHESTER Κατάλογοι Εταιρεία
|
Εταιρικά Νέα :
- Home - Supreme Court of the United States
On June 22, 1983, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Karcher v Daggett , in which it found that the population discrepancies for New Jersey’s recently redrawn congressional districts went beyond the allowable bounds
- Home - Supreme Court of the United States
On June 22, 1983, the Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Karcher v Daggett , in which it found that the population discrepancies for New Jersey’s recently redrawn congressional districts went beyond the allowable bounds
- Opinions - Supreme Court of the United States
All opinions in a single case are published together and are prefaced by a syllabus prepared by the Reporter of Decisions that summarizes the Court’s decision The Justice who authors the majority or principal opinion often will summarize the opinion from the bench during a Court session
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Taking into account these competing considerations, the Court con-cludes that the separation of powers principles explicated in the Court’s precedent necessitate at least a presumptive immunity from criminal prosecution for a President’s acts within the outer perimeter of his official responsibility Such an immunity is required to safe-
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The Colorado Supreme Court accordingly ordered Secre tary Griswold not to “list President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot” or “count any write-in
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
After the Idaho Supreme Court construed the law, the Dis-trict Court revisited its findings, and reaffirmed its entry of the injunction See 2023 WL 3284977, *1, *5 (May 4, 2023) In line with standard practice, that decision now can go to the Court of Appeals, and the District Court can afterward
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Opinion of the Court NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D C 20543, pio@supremecourt gov, of any typographical or other formal errors SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
heightened scrutiny under the First Amendment, the court assumed without deciding that strict, rather than interme-diate, scrutiny applied Id , at 948–952 The court held that the Act satisfied that standard, finding that the Govern-ment’s national security justifications—countering China’s
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
*We note that the District Court recently denied class certification as to the detainees’ underlying habeas cl aims challenging the validity of re-moval under the AEA See ECF Doc 67 By its own terms, the District Court’s order is “automatically vacated” by our order granting a writ of certiorari Id , at 2
- SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
For all the rhetoric of the dissents, today’s order and per curiam confirm that the detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal The only question is which court will resolve that challenge For the reasons set forth, we
|
|