|
- CSS Child vs Descendant selectors - Stack Overflow
I am a bit confused between these 2 selectors Does the descendent selector: div p select all p within a div whether or not it's an immediate descedent? So if the p is inside another div it will
- Difference between child, following and descendant in XPath axes
27 child:: will select the immediate descendants of the context node, but does not go any deeper, like descendant:: does following:: will select all of the nodes that come after the context node and their descendant's, but that does not include the context node's descendants
- css - What is the difference direct descendent ( gt;) vs. descendant in . . .
What is the difference direct descendent (>) vs descendant in jQuery selectors? Asked 13 years, 7 months ago Modified 1 year, 6 months ago Viewed 10k times
- Difference between Child and Descendant Combinator Selectors
The descendant selector targets the child and other descendants of the parent ancestor Both selectors target child-level elements, so in those cases there won't appear to be any difference between them
- Whats the difference between node and descendant::node in xpath?
I use a lot of XPath when locating elements in web pages using Selenium, and have moved away from using node1 node2 towards using node1 descendant::node2 more recently What's the difference betwe
- CSS child vs descendent selector - Stack Overflow
Save this answer Show activity on this post Theoretically the child selector will be faster than the descendant selector because the browser can stop checking child nodes after the first level However, I suspect that any performance enhancement you see from this will be negligible as browsers parse CSS quickly in the first place
- Is there a difference in performance between the child and descendant . . .
Is there a difference in performance between the child and descendant selectors? Asked 9 years, 10 months ago Modified 9 years, 10 months ago Viewed 2k times
- xpath using and descendant-or-self and self - Stack Overflow
Firstly, for all practical purposes, descendant-or-self::book means the same as book, so your first expression is correct but unnecessarily verbose Your second expression uses book[year=descendant-or-self::book ] In your sample XML document, books do not have descendant books, so this is equivalent to book[year=self::book ], which is your third expression Your third expression
|
|
|