|
- How Trump quietly made the historic decision to launch . . . - CNN
Discussions about potential options for American strikes on Iran began in earnest between Trump and members of his national security team during a weekend retreat at Camp David in early June
- A Potential Strike on Iran Tests Trump’s Propensity to Play . . .
But the prospect that the United States might join Israel in bombing Iran is testing his ability to embrace dueling positions with little to no political cost
- Trump’s decision to strike Iran may draw more criticism from . . .
President Donald Trump's decision to strike three nuclear sites in Iran will almost assuredly draw more criticism from some of the Republican's supporters, including high-profile backers who had
- Iran Strike Tests Trump’s Propensity to Play to Both Sides
Iran Strike Tests Trump’s Propensity to Play to Both Sides June 22, 2025 at 6:12 am EDT By Taegan Goddard Leave a Comment New York Times : “Since his first campaign for president 10 years ago, Mr Trump has excelled at appearing to favor both sides of the same issue, allowing supporters to hear what they want to hear, whether he’s talking
- Strikes on Iran mark Trumps biggest, and riskiest, foreign . . .
The dramatic U S strike, including the targeting of Iran’s most heavily fortified nuclear installation deep underground, marks the biggest foreign policy gamble of Trump’s two presidencies
- Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran . . .
President Donald Trump’s bombardment of three sites in Iran has quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval
- As Trump considers US strikes on Iran, polls suggest . . .
President Donald Trump has in recent hours employed increasingly bold rhetoric about involving the United States in Israel’s attacks on Iran On Tuesday afternoon, he wrote on Truth Social that
|
|
|