- python - Mock vs MagicMock - Stack Overflow
With Mock you can mock magic methods but you have to define them MagicMock has "default implementations of most of the magic methods " If you don't need to test any magic methods, Mock is adequate and doesn't bring a lot of extraneous things into your tests If you need to test a lot of magic methods MagicMock will save you some time
- Shroomery - Magic Mushrooms (Shrooms) Demystified
Detailed magic mushroom information including growing shrooms, mushroom identification, spores, psychedelic art, trip reports and an active community
- Shroomery Message Board
Discuss magic mushrooms and other hallucinogens, get cultivation advice, and learn about the psychedelic experience A wide range of other forums too
- Magic Mushroom Guide For VA - Mushroom Hunting and Identification . . .
I'm kind of curious as to the lack of information on wild magic mushrooms in Virginia I've put together a list of three species: psilocybe caerulipes, Panaeolus Subbalteatus, and gymnopilus aeruginosus;
- Python returns MagicMock object instead of return_value
When testing, A() returns the return_value from mock_A (a regular MagicMock, as you haven't specified anything else), which is not an instance of the class A You need to set that return_value to be something that has a defined method_a
- do magic mushrooms exist in tennessee - Mushroom Hunting and . . .
Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
- Shroomery - Which psilocybin mushrooms grow wild in my area?
Mushrooms that contain psilocybin can be found almost anywhere in the world
- linux - tar:invalid magic, tar:short read - Stack Overflow
tar:invalid magic, tar:short read Asked 4 years, 5 months ago Modified 4 years, 5 months ago Viewed 21k times
|