|
- Dickinson (a. k. a. the Portland Chicken) et al. v. Trump et al.
The ACLU of Oregon and its cooperating attorneys submitted an emergency filing on behalf of protesters and journalists on January 27, 2026, in Dickinson (a k a "the Portland Chicken") v Trump seeking a temporary restraining order
- Dickinson v. Trump, 3:25-cv-02170 – CourtListener. com
Docket for Dickinson v Trump, 3:25-cv-02170 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information
- Dickinson v. Trump 3:25-cv-02170 (D. Or. ) | Civil Rights Litigation . . .
They brought this class action on behalf of themselves, and others similarly situated, to stop the government's alleged pattern and practice of violating plaintiffs’ First Amendment rights while they are attending protests outside of the one- block building located in Portland
- 25-2170 - Dickinson et al v. Trump et al - Document in Context - GovInfo
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF 106 (sealed); ECF 94 (unsealed and redacted), the specific terms of which are stated in a separate concurrently filed Order of Preliminary Injunction
- Dickinson et al v. Trump et al, No. 3:2025cv02170 - Justia Law
On one occasion in mid-August, a DHS officer fired less lethal munitions that shuck Mr Dickinson in the head Mr Dickinson repeatedly witnessed and has been subjected to violence by DHS officers who used chemical munitions against him on multiple occasions
- Dickinson et al v. Trump et al (3:25-cv-02170), Oregon District Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF 106 (sealed); ECF 94 (unsealed and redacted), the specific terms of which are stated in a separate concurrently filed Order of Preliminary Injunction
- Federal Judge Cites Senior Lecturer Karen U. Lindell’s Research in . . .
Dickinson v Trump was filed in late 2025 by the ACLU of Oregon on behalf of protesters and journalists who alleged that federal agents unlawfully used tear gas, pepper balls, and other crowd-control measures against nonviolent participants at protests near the Portland ICE facility
- Dickinson v. Trump | 25-2170 | D. Or. | Judgment | Law - CaseMine
On one occasion in mid-August, a DHS officer fired less lethal munitions that shuck Mr Dickinson in the head Mr Dickinson repeatedly witnessed and has been subjected to violence by DHS officers who used chemical munitions against him on multiple occasions
|
|
|