|
- What is infinity divided by infinity? - Mathematics Stack Exchange
I know that $\\infty \\infty$ is not generally defined However, if we have 2 equal infinities divided by each other, would it be 1? if we have an infinity divided by another half-as-big infinity, for
- Mathematics Stack Exchange
Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
- Difference between ≈, ≃, and ≅ - Mathematics Stack Exchange
In my work "=" is the identity of a number so it states an equivalence 1=1, 2x=10 ie x =5 The approximation sign "≈" I use for decimal approximations with tilde "~" being a rougher approximation
- Is there any historical evidence for Marx being a Satanist?
I'm reading Wurmbrand's Marx and Satan on academia edu right now, and so far it seems like the author has conflated heretical remarks and descriptions (frequently literary or poetic!) by Marx, with the alleged doctrines and practices of a (likely fictitious) cult of Satan-worshipers
- Justifying why 0 0 is indeterminate and 1 0 is undefined
$\begingroup$ I would call it naive in the sense that when referring to "indeterminate forms in the form of $\frac{0}{0}$" we aren't referring to the actual explicit division of zero by zero, but rather we are talking about a limit of a ratio where both the numerator and denominator approach zero simultaneously
- calculus - Finding $\int x^xdx$ - Mathematics Stack Exchange
let ${x}^{x} = {\left({e}^{\ln {x}} \right)}^{x} = {e}^{x \ln {x}} $ By the series expansion of ${e}^{x}$: $${e}^{x \ln {x}} = \sum _{ n=0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac
- Prove that $1^3 + 2^3 + . . . + n^3 = (1+ 2 + . . . + n)^2$
Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers
- epistemology - Fallacy by Sherlock Holmes Eliminate the impossible . . .
Well, the fallacy would not be in Sherlock Holmes line; that remains perfectly valid The fallacy would be in the hybris of the person who did not carefully conduct an exhaustive search for alternatives
|
|
|