|
- CCS (CCA) RULES, 1965 - Department of Personnel Training
EXPLANATION - Where the disciplinary authority itself holds the inquiry, any reference in sub-rule (7) to sub-rule (20) and in sub-rule (22) to the inquiring authority shall be construed as a reference to the disciplinary authority
- HAND BOOK ON DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS FOR DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITIES . . .
Disciplinary authority does not necessarily mean an authority competent to impose the penalty of dismissal; he is an authority competent to impose any of the penalties, as defined under clause ( c) of Rule 2 of the CCA
- DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS CCS(CCA) RULES 1965 - ISTM
case It is not mandatory for the disciplinary authority to dismiss the employee whenever he has been convicted in a criminal case The authority concerned will have to go thorough the judgment and take a decision depending upon the circumstances of the case 15 Another occasion when the disciplinary authority may impose penalty on
- Supreme Court: Disciplinary Proceedings Need Not Be Initiated by the . . .
The Court clarified that Article 311(1) of the Constitution protects employees from dismissal by a subordinate authority but does not mandate that disciplinary proceedings must be initiated by the appointing authority
- Om Pal Singh vs Disciplinary Authority on 14 January, 2020 - Indian Kanoon
The Disciplinary Authority, in compliance with the order of the High Court, reconsidered the matter and reiterated the penalty of reduction of 15 stages lower in time scale of pay for a period of eight years
- Suspension and Dismissal of a Government Servant
Dismissal is the termination of a government servant’s employment as a result of proven misconduct It is the most severe penalty and usually follows a detailed inquiry process Grounds for Dismissal: Severe misconduct or breach of duty Criminal conviction Actions that bring disrepute to the government service Procedure for Dismissal:
- DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS - MCRHRDI
a) The Disciplinary Authority should examine whether the P E has been properly done b) If done properly, what misconduct offence fault, if any, has been made out prima facie? c) If so, should he lodge an FIR ( in case of cognizable offence) with the Police as a step towards Criminal Prosecution? d) Should he file a complaint before the Competent
- Disciplinary proceedings | Case Laws - Referencer
The disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts The Court Tribunal in its power of review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its own independent findings on the evidence
|
|
|